The hand of an extremely fit person is a weapon in itself and can inflict injury and a “disproportionately light punishment” handed out to the assaulter frustrates the victim, the Supreme Court said on Thursday, sentencing former cricketer Navjot Singh Sidhu to a year’s rigorous imprisonment in a 1988 road rage case.
A fine of Rs 1,000 is grossly inadequate punishment for a crime involving the death of Gurnam Singh, the SC said, agreeing with review petitioner’s counsel Sidharth Luthra. “A disproportionately light punishment humiliates and frustrates a victim of crime when the offender goes unpunished or is let off with a relatively minor punishment,” the bench said.
Justices SK Kaul and AM Khanwilkar said, “While a disproportionately severe sentence ought not to be passed, simultaneously it also does not clothe the law courts to award a sentence which would be manifestly inadequate, having due regard to the nature of the offence, since an inadequate sentence would fail to produce a deterrent effect on the society at large.”